UX Research Project

Monster: Career Advice Microsite

Timeline: Winter 2019
Team: Solo Project
Role: Lead UX Researcher

Overview

The Monster.com career advice microsite had been experiencing a steadily increasing bounce rate. Through targeted research studies, I discovered the issue wasn't with content quality as initially assumed, but rather with the visual design and information architecture, preventing a costly content rewrite and leading to data-driven redesign recommendations.

14+
Participants
6
Research Methods
12
Key Insights

Research Methods

Unmoderated Testing Quasi-Experimental Design Competitive Analysis Usability Testing

Tools Used

UserTesting Analytics User Surveys

Domains

Career Services Content Strategy Information Architecture

Background & Context

Monster.com's career advice section had been experiencing an increasing bounce rate over time, raising concerns about user engagement with this important content. The career advice section serves as a prime vehicle for maintaining high search engine rankings, making it a strategically important part of Monster's digital ecosystem.

Graph showing increasing bounce rate for Monster.com/career-advice

The bounce rate for Monster.com/career-advice had been increasing over time.

The project was initiated when space became available in the product roadmap to address this long-standing issue. The initial hypothesis within the team was that outdated content was the primary cause of user disengagement, potentially requiring a massive content rewrite initiative. My research would test this assumption and uncover the actual factors driving the increased bounce rate.

Research Objectives

This research project aimed to identify the root causes of the increasing bounce rate on the Career Advice microsite and develop evidence-based recommendations for improvement.

1
Test the initial hypothesis that outdated content (indicated by old publish dates) was causing users to leave the site
2
Identify problematic user experience issues within the Career Advice microsite
3
Understand user perceptions and expectations when interacting with career advice content
4
Develop specific, actionable redesign recommendations based on research findings

Approach & Methodology

I designed a two-phase research approach: an initial pre-kickoff study to challenge assumptions and gather directional insights, followed by targeted mini-studies to explore specific problem areas in depth.

Pre-Kickoff Exploration

Unmoderated, quasi-experimental walkthrough to gauge initial impressions and expectations versus actual experiences with the site.

14 participants
Current job seekers

Targeted Mini-Studies

A series of focused studies examining specific aspects of the user experience: searching, browsing, navigation, and visual design.

Multiple studies
Various participants

For the pre-kickoff study, I designed a questionnaire that first captured users' initial expectations of the microsite, then asked them to explore the site for relevant content, and finally reassessed their perceptions after this exploration. This approach allowed me to identify gaps between expectations and reality while minimizing moderator bias.

Screenshot of the pre-project questionnaire

The pre-project questionnaire design captured changing perceptions before and after site exploration.

Key Findings

The research revealed a significant disconnect between users' initial impressions of the site (influenced by visual design) and their assessment of the actual content quality after exploration.

Finding 1: Content quality was not the issue

Contrary to the initial hypothesis, participants did not mention or express concern about publication dates or content freshness. In fact, the content quality exceeded user expectations once they engaged with it.

I was pleasantly surprised by how useful the advice was, despite the site not looking very modern.
— Participant 8

Finding 2: Visual design undermined content credibility

Initial impressions of the site were mixed, with negative sentiment primarily focused on the visual design and UI elements. The subpar visual design created low expectations for content quality, even though the content itself was valuable.

Chart showing split sentiment in initial impressions

Initial impressions showed a bifurcated response: sentiment was split between positive and negative.

Finding 3: Relevancy perceptions improved dramatically after exploration

The average relevancy score increased from 3.2 out of 10 before exploration to 5.9 after users spent time browsing the content. This indicates that poor first impressions were preventing users from discovering valuable content.

Chart showing improvement in relevancy scores

Post-exploration relevancy results averaged 5.9, compared to initial impressions of 3.2.

Insights & Recommendations

Based on the findings from both the initial research and the focused mini-studies, I developed specific insights and actionable recommendations to address the bounce rate issue.

Search Functionality

Users expected search capabilities to be prominent and were frustrated when they couldn't locate them quickly.

Recommendations

  • Position search functionality prominently above the fold
  • Clearly differentiate between job search and article search
  • Maintain consistent search placement across all career advice pages

Navigation & Wayfinding

Users struggled to understand their location within the content hierarchy and needed clearer visual cues.

Recommendations

  • Continue using breadcrumb navigation but enhance visibility
  • Use text styles (bolding, size changes) to confirm user location
  • Consider implementing tags for cross-category navigation
  • Maintain consistency in navigational elements throughout the site

Visual Design

The current visual design creates low expectations for content quality and doesn't inspire confidence.

Recommendations

  • Modernize the design to match competitors like Indeed (consistently rated highest in user preference)
  • Balance predictability with variation in design elements
  • Create clear visual hierarchy with distinct category titles
  • Feature one "exclusive" article prominently above the fold

Impact & Outcomes

This research had significant strategic impact by redirecting resources from an unnecessary content rewrite to targeted improvements in visual design and information architecture.

100%
Content rewrite costs avoided
84%
Increase in relevancy perception

The findings from this research directly informed the redesign of the Career Advice microsite, focusing on improving visual design, navigation, and information architecture while preserving the valuable existing content. By addressing the actual issues identified through research rather than assumed problems, Monster was able to allocate resources more effectively and create a better user experience that leveraged existing assets.

Reflections

This project reinforced the importance of challenging assumptions through research before embarking on potentially costly initiatives. What was initially assumed to be a content quality issue turned out to be primarily a presentation and user experience challenge.

What Went Well

  • Early research intervention prevented unnecessary content rewrite
  • The mini-studies approach allowed for targeted, efficient exploration of specific issues
  • Cross-functional stakeholder buy-in based on clear, actionable findings

Challenges

  • Overcoming strongly held initial assumptions about content being the issue
  • Balancing the need for quick insights with methodological rigor
  • Coordinating multiple mini-studies within tight timeframes

Lessons Learned

  • Visual design significantly impacts perceived content quality and credibility
  • Testing assumptions early can prevent resource misallocation
  • Users often form initial impressions based on design, not content
  • A series of targeted studies can be more effective than one large study
Next Case Study

TikTok Crisis Information Study

Examining how users make sense of crisis information on visual social media platforms.

View Case Study